Finance Research Seminar
- 
Current InformationThe Finance Research Seminar takes place during the lecture period on Tuesdays from 16.15 pm to 17.45 pm (im Room JUR 253) The format of each session—whether in-person, via Zoom, or hybrid—will be specified in the event invitation. The seminar is jointly organised by Nicole Branger, Nadja Guenster, Thomas Langer, Andreas Pfingsten and Christoph Schneider. If you have any questions about the event, please contact Mira Maslej,mira.maslej@wiwi.uni-muenster.de. The FR-Seminar will take place as a face-to-face event, in JUR 253. A Zoom meeting will also be offered. Winter Term 2025/2026 Date Speaker Topic 30.09.2025 Dr. Eric JohnsonColumbia University Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences with implications for research practices. Policymakers increasingly rely on behavioral science in response to global challenges, such as climate change or global health crises. But applications of behavioral science face an important problem: Interventions often exert substantially different effects across contexts and individuals. We examine this heterogeneity for different paradigms that underlie many behavioral interventions. We study the paradigms in a series of five pre-registered studies across one in-person and 10 online panels, with over 11,000 respond-ents in total. We find substantial heterogeneity across settings and paradigms, apply techniques for modeling the heterogeneity, and introduce a framework that measures typically omitted moderators. The framework’s factors (Fluid Intelligence, Attentiveness, Crystallized Intelligence, and Experience) affect the effectiveness of many text-based interventions, producing different observed effect sizes and explaining variations across samples. Moderators are associated with effect sizes through two paths, with the intensity of the manipulation and with the effect of the manipulation directly. Our results motivate observing these moderators and provide a theoretical and empirical framework for understanding and predicting varying effect sizes in the social sciences. We conclude with a discussion of how to apply these results to improve research in the social sciences. Special Event Wednesday, 01.10.2025 Prof. Dr. Elke U. WeberPrinceton University Query Theory: A Process Account of Constructed Judgments and Preferences Query Theory (QT) describes the process of generating and aggregating internal evidence about the merits of different judgment or choice options for the purpose of arriving at a judgment or choice. Its assumptions about selective attention and goal-directed memory retrieval provide a unified explanation of a broad set of behavioral anomalies. QT assumes that boundedly-rational decision makers issue sequential queries to their episodic and semantic memory that request arguments in support of a specific choice option, one option at a time, but switching between options. The returned evidence is aggregated, and the option with greater support at the time of decision is selected. Critically, the request for evidence supporting the first-considered option temporarily inhibits arguments for all other options that are response competitors, making evidence supporting later-queried options harder to access when subsequent queries turn to them. Normatively irrelevant features of the way a choice is presented can be shown to influence initial attention and hence query order and choice, including incumbency or status-quo (which option is the behavioral or recommended default), surface appeal (an attractive label or image), or mechanics of the choice situation such as presentation order or reading order. The causal role of query order is established by prompting respondents in a QT study explicitly to reverse the order of queries from their "natural" order (i.e., the order aligned with the framing condition) to the reverse or “unnatural” order, which greatly attenuated the effect of frame on judgment or choice. A meta-analysis of 27 QT studies confirms all QT assumptions and shows that an average effect size of .34 for the effect of decision frame on query order. QT processes have also been shown to mediate the influence of social norms on attitudes and behaviors, where norm information directs initial attention on norm-congruent arguments and thus influences policy support.07.10.2025 Asst. Prof.
 Daniel UrbanErasmus University Rotterdam Board Gender Quotas and Female Borrowing: Evidence from Loan-Level Data We examine how female board representation affects banks' lending to female-led firms, using Italy's mandatory gender quota and loan-level data. As banks increase female board presence, they lend more to female-led firms on both extensive and intensive margins, including smaller firms, without increasing non-performing exposures. Female borrowers see an increase in credit availability beyond reallocation effects and show higher post-quota growth, indicating real economic effects. We also uncover organizational changes: banks promote more women among rank-and-file employees, which can explain female credit growth. Our findings highlight how board-level gender diversity can shape credit allocation and influence broader organizational outcomes.18.11.2025 Dr. Christian BreitungTechnical University of Munich and TUM School of Management, Heilbronn Text Is All You Need: Asset Pricing Without Returns How should investors value firms without return histories? When trading data are missing, investors typically rely on industry betas as coarse proxies for systematic risk, introducing valuation errors whenever firm-specific exposures differ from peer norms. Using IPOs as a natural laboratory, I show that textual risk disclosures can substitute for missing return data. I develop Aggregated Cluster Embeddings (ACE), which convert qualitative risk narratives into structured firm-level representations. Disclosure-based betas reduce market beta prediction errors by up to 27 percent relative to standard benchmarks (industry betas). However, investors underweight this information at issuance, and firms whose disclosures imply lower risk than their industry peers are initially undervalued, yielding monthly six-factor alphas of 97 basis points. These excess returns fade as return histories accumulate, consistent with markets gradually learning firm-specific covariances. The results highlight a mechanism of information substitution and investor inattention in pricing firms without trading histories. 25.11.2025 Jun.-Prof. Dr. Jantke de BoerRUB Bochum tbd. 16.12.2025 Prof. Dr. Lars NordenBrazilian School of Economics and Finance (EPGE) FX Dealer Constraints and External Imbalances 
 (joint with Stefan Eichler)We empirically test Gabaix and Maggiori (2015)'s prediction that currencies are repriced by the country's external capital dependence when financial constraints of FX intermediaries change. Using solvency indicators, we develop a novel intermediary constraints index capturing riskbearing capacity. We find that constraints are a priced risk factor in currency portfolios sorted by countries' net foreign assets. Portfolios of external debtors (creditors) have higher (lower) intermediary risk premia, but pay lower (higher) returns when constraints tighten. Tightening constraints are associated with a depreciation of countries with low net foreign assets, particularly emerging markets with high net debt and low FX reserves.Summer Term 2025 Date Speaker Topic 27.05.2025 Craig R. Fox, Ph.D.University of California at Los Angeles Two Dimensions of Subjective Uncertainty In my talk I will argue that people maintain dual intuitions about the nature of uncertainty, and these intuitions can have a critical impact on a wide range of judgments and choices. We attribute the first form of uncertainty to deficiencies in our information, expertise, and/or mental model of relevant events (knowable or “epistemic” uncertainty); we attribute the second form of uncertainty to causal systems whose behavior is inherently stochastic or unpredictable (random or “aleatory” uncertainty). In the first part of my talk I’ll show that people intuitively distinguish uncertainty along these two dimensions: it is reflected in their use of natural language and can be measured reliably using a simple rating scale that loads on two independent factors. In the second part of my talk I’ll show implications of the epistemic-aleatory distinction for understanding judgmental overconfidence, ambiguity aversion, consumer financial decision making, managerial evaluation, and other empirical phenomena. 17.06.2025 Prof. Dr.
 Matthias PelsterUniversität Duisburg-Essen Ranking concerns or reference points: The impact of communicating expected payoffs in experimental studies Online platforms such as CloudResearch, Amazon MTurk, or Prolific require researchers to communicate average expected payoffs to participants prior to experiments. We show that knowledge of expected payoffs introduce confounding effects in experimental studies on risk-taking. We use the literature that shows that individuals with lower ranks take higher risks as a playground. Our experimental design disentangles this ranking effect from a reference point effect introduced by the average expected payoff. Holding the rank constant, risk-taking is 18.23% higher below the reference point on average. Holding the reference point distance constant, ranks have no significant effect on risk-taking. These results are robust to nonsocial settings and alternative risk-taking measures.08.07.2025 Asst. Prof. Mete KilicUniversity of Southern California Marshall School of Business 15.07.2025 Ahmet Ali Taskin, Ph.D.FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg & Institute for Employment Research (IAB) Monetary policy, the bank-lending channel and labor market adjustment of firms This paper studies the real effects of monetary policy on firms’ labor adjustment. Using detailed bank, firm and worker data for Germany, we find that firms reduce employment in response to contractionary monetary policy. We show that this employment reduction results from a relative decline in inflows rather than outflows. Inflows fall in particular for low-wage workers, whereas firms retain high-wage workers. We interpret this as evidence for labor hoarding. Using variation in the bank exposure to monetary policy, we show that these results are driven by the exposure of the firm to the bank-lending channel.- 
Lectures from past TermsWinter term 2024/2025 Date Speaker Topic 22.10.2024 Prof. Dr. Steven OngenaUniversity of Zurich Joining Forces: Why Banks Syndicate Credit Banks can grant loans to firms bilaterally or in syndicates. We study this choice by combining bilateral loan data with syndicated loan data. We show that loan size alone does not adequately explain syndication. Instead, banks’ ability to manage risks and firm riskiness drive the choice to syndicate. Banks are more likely to syndicate loans if their risk-bearing capacity is low and if screening and monitoring come at a high cost. Syndicated loans are more expensive and more sensitive to loan risk than bilateral loans. Our findings contradict the hypothesis that reputable borrowers graduate to the syndicated loan market.29.10.2024 Prof. Dr. Neslihan OzkanBristol University Politics of Bank Lending: Empirical Evidence from Brown Borrowing This study examines the interplay between banks’ political connections and lending to brown borrowers. A bank’s political connection is captured based on whether a bank is headquartered in the state with a member from the U.S. Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee. We find that banks headquartered in states with a Banking Committee senator provide cheaper loans to brown borrowers than banks without a Banking Committee senator in their headquarter state. This finding suggests that politically connected banks can play a significant role in delaying the green transition as they extend loans to brown firms at a low rate. In addition, our results show that the effect of a bank’s political connection on the cost of lending to brown borrowers is more pronounced when the senator is senior, when borrowers, lenders, and banking committee senators are from the same state, or when the party of the Senate is Republican, or when there is a competitive re-election race. Overall, we provide novel evidence on how the politics of bank lending can have implications for green transition.05.11.2024 Asst. Prof. Dr. Paulo RodriguesMaastricht University Solving Dynamic Portfolio and Consumption Problems by Going Forward in Time The standard approach to solving dynamic portfolio and consumption problems numerically uses backward induction, which complicates the solution if decisions at time t depend on past decisions. In contrast, our solution algorithm goes forward in time. We use the insight that the main task in solving dynamic optimization problems consists of finding policy functions that use the current value of state variables as inputs and give the optimal decisions as outputs. Instead of assuming a functional form for these policy functions, we use a neural network for the estimation of the functions.12.11.2024 
 im K322Assoc. Prof. Jörg StahlCatólica Lisbon School of Business & Economics The value of organized networking: Evidence from the World Economic Forum Several studies document a positive impact of social interaction on business activity and economic outcomes. While the literature identifies several ways of forming social ties, there is little evidence on the value of participating in business events that foster networking. In this paper, we analyze the value of having access to one such event - the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF). We compile a novel dataset of public firms that participate at least once in the meeting between 2013 and 2023. Participants experience positive abnormal equity returns in the days leading to the respective meeting. We identify M&A activity as a channel that can rationalize the value effects. Meeting participants have larger number of deals and higher deal values following the meeting compared to a matched control sample.07.01.2025 Dr.Gerrit LiedtkeBremen University Cross-Asset Trend Spillover: A Novel Factor for Corporate Bond Returns We propose XTREND, a cross-asset trend factor for corporate bond returns that captures spillovers from equity market price and volume data. Using two decades of U.S. data, we apply machine learning techniques to extract information from various technical indicators, including moving averages, oscillators, and volatility measures. The resulting signal reliably predicts corporate bond returns, demonstrating robust performance across credit quality and market conditions. XTREND expands existing bond pricing models, thus, providing a more complete explanation of the cross-section of bond returns. Finally, we find that the XTREND factor is robust across 1.6 million research designs and has a probability far above 50\% to be part of the stochastic discount factor after sampling over one quadrillion models.14.01.2025 Prof. Dr. Christian FiebergHSB-Bremen University of Applied Sciences The Devil in the Details: A Multiverse View of Pockets of Predictability The growing complexity of forecasting models increases the number of decision nodes in the research process, raising the risk of overfitting to specific design choices. We illustrate this issue using the recent concept of “pockets of predictability,” which posits that return predictability is time-varying and that short windows of high predictability can be identified ex-ante. In this study, we reassess the robustness and practical applicability of this approach. By analyzing a multiverse of 19,440 variations of the original methodology, we find that its effectiveness depends critically on various seemingly minor methodological decisions. Furthermore, return predictability has declined significantly in recent decades, and the potential economic gains are highly sensitive to trading costs. Overall, strategies based on pockets of predictability should be approached with caution.28.01.2025 Prof. Dr. Stefanie KleimeierMaastricht University POSTPONED until further notice! Summer term 2024 Date speaker Topic 16.04.2024 Prof. Dr. Matthias EfingHEC Paris Risk Managers in Banks Some bank regulators warn that risk managers (RMs) will collude with banks’ front offices (FOs) and rubberstamp investments if their bonuses depend on the performance of FOs. We show theoretically that positive pay correlation between FOs and RMs can instead be optimal. Based on data for German non-executive bank employees, we show empirically that performance pay is indeed positively correlated between RMs and FOs in practice. These pay correlations tend to be higher in banks with competent directors and in banks with stronger performance during the crisis of 2008, in line with our model predictions.07.05.2024 Prof. Dr. Christoph MerkleAarhus University Nudging Investors towards Sustainability - A Field Experiment with a Robo - Advisor In a field experiment with a German robo-advisor, we manipulate default investment settings including whether the investment follows sustainability principles or not. 1,629 new customers complete the manipulated onboarding and invest real money. 50% invest sustainably when sustainable investing is the default, but only 22% invest sustainably when the conventional investment is the default. In a survey with a subset of these investors (response rate 30%), we find that beliefs strongly depend on the selected investment. Almost all conventional investors expect higher returns and a better risk-return trade-off from the conventional investment in line with financial theory. However, a majority of sustainable investors believes that the sustainable investment will outperform. While sustainability preferences also predict investment behavior, the strong return focus contradicts the view that investors are willing to forgo substantial returns for a sustainable investment.14.05.2024 Prof. Dr. Tim AdamHumboldt-University of Berlin Rating-Sensitive Bonds We test whether firms issue rating-sensitive bonds (RSB) as a signal of their credit quality. We find that upon announcement the issuer’s stock and bond prices increase significantly, while the issuer’s CDS spread declines. Firms subject to higher information asymmetries and firms just above the non-investment grade threshold are more likely to issue RSB, especially during periods of market distress. RSB issuers are ex-post more likely to experience a credit rating improvement relative to regular bond issuers. These results are consistent with RSBs being a credible signaling device.28.05.2024 Prof. Dr. Steffen HitzemannHouston University Does Sustainable Investing Make Stocks Less Sensitive to Information about Cash Flows? Traditional finance theory asserts that stock prices depend on expected future cash flows. We explore how the growing prominence of non-pecuniary preferences in the form of sustainable investing alters this core financial relationship. Using the setting of earnings announcements, we find that sustainable investing diminishes stock price sensitivity to earnings news by 45%-58%. This decline in announcement-day returns is mirrored by a comparable drop in trading volume. This effect persists beyond the immediate announcement period, implying a lasting alteration in price formation rather than a short-lived mispricing. Our findings suggest that sustainable investing reduces the significance of cash flows in shaping stock prices.04.06.2024 Prof. Dr. Mete KilicUSC Marshall-University Risk and Risk-Free Rates Risk-free interest rates and the VIX index comove negatively on average, as predicted by precautionary savings. But this comovement turns positive on FOMC days. This pattern is consistently observed across a diverse array of risk-free interest rates, including nominal, real, swap, short-term, and long-term rates. Our high-frequency analysis reveals that the positive impact of monetary policy shocks on financial market risk drives this result. We provide an explanation for these findings in a model where levered investors akin to financial intermediaries hold and price a risky asset, such as equity. Upon an unexpected positive monetary policy shock, equilibrium interest rates and levered investors' borrowing costs increase persistently. This raises investors' leverage and the volatility of stochastic discount factor, leading to lower risk appetite and amplified financial market risks.09.07.2024 Dr. William QuinnQueen's University Belfast Who Wins and Loses in a Bubble? Evidence from the British Bicycle Mania How do different types of investors perform during financial bubbles? Using a rich archival source, we explore investor performance during the British bicycle mania of the 1890s. We find that directors and employees of cycle companies reduced their holdings substantially during the crash. Those holding shares after the crash were generally not from groups stereotypically thought of as naïve, but gentlemen living near a stock exchange, who had sufficient time, money, and opportunity to engage in speculation. Our findings suggest that the investors most at risk of losing during a bubble are those prone to familiarity and overconfidence biases.Summer Term 2023 Date Speaker Topic 09.05.2023 Prof. Dr. Heiko JacobsUniversity Duisburg-Essen News, noise, hype? Media sentiment and price run-ups We empirically test competing hypotheses about the role of financial media sentiment in price run-ups. Our global analysis of unusual price increases in long-only as well as long/short stock market segments provides no evidence of media slant. This assessment is further supported, among others, by the analysis of thematically focused articles, by the study of price discovery during media strikes as well as by the analysis of media sentiment in the context of twin stocks. Overall, our findings are consistent with the informative nature of the financial media. tba Dr. Sabine BernardGoethe University Frankfurt tba Winter Term 2022/23 Date Speaker Topic 08.11.2022 Dr. Doron ReichmannRuhr-University Bochum Listen Closely: Using Vocal Clues to Predict Future Earnings In this study, we aim to advance the prediction of firm earnings – an important task for many business applications. While existing earnings prediction models only rely on numerical financial data, we hypothesize and find that vocal cues from manager speech yield substantial predictive power. Our vocal cue models significantly outperform models based on detailed financial data and textual inputs. We further analyze the models' economic value to investment practitioners. We find that investors can use the models' earnings forecasts to implement trading strategies that beat the market by 8.8% on average per year. Moreover, financial analysts can use vocal cues to improve their earnings forecast accuracy by more than 40%. Collectively, our results imply that managers' vocal cues are important information signals for future earnings that investment practitioners currently overhear. 15.11.2022 Prof. Klaus SchaeckUniversity of Bristol The Lending Channel of Bank Climate Stress Tests We ask how bank climate stress test affects firm outcomes. Using the French Bank Climate Risk Stress Test in 2020 as a natural experiment, we find initial results that stress tested banks reduce credit supply and charge higher interest rates for high emitters in the syndicated loan markets. We propose to examine how high emitters that linked to stress tested banks change their investment. Our results shed light on the debate about the role of banks in promoting a carbon-neutral economy. 29.11.2022 Prof. Dr. Oliver SpaltUniversität Mannheim The Impact of Institutional Investors on Equity Prices: Evidence From A Reform of U.S. Trust Law We study the equity market implications of a reform in the laws that govern trust investments, implemented in a staggered fashion across U.S. states from 1986 to 2007. The introduction of the prudent investor rule systematically alters the relative attractiveness of stocks within the cross-section of U.S. equities for trust funds. As trust funds account for a substantial fraction of institutional equity holdings in our sample period, our empirical setting provides a rare opportunity to study the impact of a regulatory change on institutional investor holdings and relative prices in the U.S. equity market. We show that in response to the law change, trusts rebalance their portfolios away from “prudent” stocks, which were implicitly advantaged under the old regulatory regime. Stocks bought by trusts after the law change substantially outperform stocks sold by those funds. The return effects are long-lasting and do not revert over the next 12 months. The results in our paper suggest that shocks to institutional investor demand can have a profound and sustained influence on stock prices and that regulatory changes can have large indirect, and potentially unintended, consequences for market prices. 06.12.2022 Assistant Prof. Roberto SteriUniversity of Luxembourg Credit Market Equivalents and the Valuation of Private Firms We propose to value leveraged buyout investments by credit market equivalents (CME). Our method relies on the observation that portfolio companies held by private equity funds have loans traded in secondary markets. We exploit their market valuations by constructing a stochastic discount factor that prices loan returns of private equity portfolios from deal-level data. We identify a credit factor model to price buyout cash flows to derive their CME valuation. We find no evidence for buyout outperformance after controlling for credit market factors. Our method works whenever credit and private equity markets are sufficiently integrated, for which we provide evidence. 17.01.2023 Associate Prof. Andras DanisCentral European University CEU Wien Shadow Inflation We use cell phone tracking data to document an increase in wait times at U.S.establishments in 2021. The results are consistent with a sudden increase in demand, coupled with severe labor constraints. The results are particularly pronounced in the restaurant industry, and the increase is particularly large at restaurants in non-white neighborhoods. We estimate that the increase in wait time creates an aggregate opportunity cost of up to $5 billion per month for American consumers. If wait time were added as an expense in the CPI consumption basket, inflation would have been up to 2 percentage points higher in the food away from home category. Finally, we show that an increase in wait time can predict future inflation. Our results suggest that wait times in the U.S. have started to increase already in 2020 in some industries,well before the supply chain disruptions of 2021. 24.01.2023 Assistant Prof.Ole WilmsUniversität Hamburg Asset Pricing with Disagreement about Climate Risks This paper presents an asset-pricing model with heterogeneous beliefs regarding the impacts of climate change. Investors disagree on the likelihood of climate-induced disaster risks that could destroy a large fraction of consumption. The model jointly explains several findings that have been established in the empirical literature on climate finance. That is, (i) news about climate change can be hedged in financial markets, (ii) the share of green investors has significantly increased over the past decade, (iii) investors require a positive, although small, climate-risk premium for holding “brown" assets, and (iv) “green" stocks have outperformed brown stocks during the past decade. Furthermore, the model may explain why investments to mitigate climate change have been small in the past. Finally, the model predicts that the marginal gain from carbon reducing investments as well as the carbon premium should increase significantly if the rise in global temperature continues. 31.01.2023 Assistant Prof. Ruediger WeberWU Wien Is there an Equity Duration Premium? Equity duration is a measure of discount-rate sensitivity that is driven by both, stock-specific cash-flow timing and stock-specific discount-rate levels. Established measures of equity duration using market-price information derive their predictive power for returns from using market-implied discount rates. We introduce new measures of pure cash-flow timing which disentangle discount-rate level from cash-flow timing information. Our results indicate an unconditionally flat relationship between timing and average returns. However, it turns out that in recessions (expansion episodes), there is a negative (positive) relation between cash-flow timing and average stock returns. 07.02.2023 Prof. Dr. Merih SevilirESMT Berlin Postpone to autumn 2023! Summer Term 2022 Date Speaker Topic 03.05.2022 Prof. Dr. Stefanie KleimeierOpen University & Maastricht University Contracts, Collateral and Culture: Gender Effects in Retail Loans We analyze gender differences in interest rates using unusually rich data on retail loans from a bank in Vietnam—a country where women traditionally make financial decisions. After ruling out gender differences in information, credit risk, and default rates, women pay marginally lower interest rates. The gender gaps differ between loans with and without an exogenous collateralization requirement suggesting that the micro context of loan negotiations matters. In support of the pivotal role of the contracting environment, we exploit historical differences between South and North Vietnam and show that women pay comparably lower rates in the more matriarchal cultural context. WINTERTERM 2020/21 Date Speaker Topic 10 November 2020 Dr. Bjoen ImbierowiczDeutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt How Are Banks Special? – Let Me Count the Ways The event will be organized as a digital Zoom-Meeting. 22 December 2020 David SchreindorferArizona State University, Tempe, USA Persistent Crises and Levered Asset Prices The event will be organized as a digital Zoom-Meeting. Summerterm 2020 Date Speaker Topic 28 April 2020 Dr. Thomas PostAssociate Professor of Finance, Open University & Maastricht University Household Finance 0.5 or 2.0? Eliciting Individuals’ Financial Decision-Making Approaches 25 May 2020 André UhdePaderborn Univeristy Tax avoidance through securitization Winterterm 2019/20 Date Speaker Topic Summerterm 2019 Date Speaker Topic 02.07.2019 Sebastian GehrickeUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand Modeling VXX under jump diffusion with stochastic long-term mean Attention Please! Starting time 12:15 in J 253. 09.07.2019 Toni AhnertBank of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Bank Competition, Bank Runs and Opacity Winterterm 2018/19 Date Speaker Topic 18.12.2018 Oliver EntropUniversity of Passau Optimal Early Exercise Strategies under Transaction and Decision Costs 15.01.2019 Sven KlinglerBI Oslo, Department of Finance How Safe are Safe Haven? - 
Lectures from Previous SemestersSummer Term 2018 Date Speaker Topic 29.05.2018 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München 
 Fakultät für Betriebswirtschaft
 Institut für Kapitalmärkte und FinanzwirtschaftFirms’ self-assessed climate risk and asset pricing Winter Term 2017/18 Date Speaker Topic 19.12.2017 Lars Norden 
 Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration (EBAPE),
 Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) Rio de JaneiroDoes Uniqueness in Banking Matter? 30.01.2018 Olav Korn 
 Georg-August-Universität GöttingenStock Illiquidity and Option Returns Summer Term 2017 Date Speaker Topic 23.05.2017 Florian S. Peters 
 University of Amsterdam (UvA)Optimism Propagation 13.06.2017 Bryan Foltice 
 Butler UniversityExponential Growth Bias Matters: Evidence and Implications for Financial Decision Making of College Students in the U.S.A. 20.06.2017 Valeri Sokolovski 
 Stockholm School of Economics
 from June 2017
 HEC MontrealCrowds, Crashes, and the Carry Trade 04.07.2017 Christian Leuz 
 University of Chicago
 Booth School of BusinessWho Falls Prey to the Wolf of Wall Street? Investor Participation in Market Manipulation 11.07.2017 Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt 
 University of CologneConcentration Bias in Intertemporal Choice 18.07.2017 Elisabeth Kempf 
 University of Chicago
 Booth School of BusinessCanary in a Coalmine: Securities Lending Predicting the Performance of Securitized Bonds Winter Term 2016/17 Date Speaker Topic 18.10.2016 Christine Laudenbach 
 Goethe Universität Frankfurt am MainPersonal reminders and commitment: debt management as a natural experiment 15.11.2016 Tobin Hanspal 
 Copenhagen Business SchoolOnce Bitten, Twice Shy: The Role of Inertia and Personal Experiences in Risk Taking 13.12.2016 Gesa-Kristina Petersen 
 LMU MünchenWhat we say is who we are - How fund manager profiles and their strategies predict fund investment and performance 24.01.2017 Valeriya Dinger 
 University of OsnabrückSystemic Effects of Bank Equity Issues: Competition, Stabilization and Contagion 31.01.2017 Olesya V. Grishchenko 
 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C.The term structure of interest rates with short-term and long-term risks 07.02.2017 Philipp Krueger 
 University of GenevaThe Sustainability Footprint of Institutional Investors Summer Term 2016 Date Speaker Topic 03.05.2016 Matthias Sutter 
 Universität zu KölnWhere to look for the morals in markets? 24.05.2016 Karl Schmedders 
 Universität ZürichAsset Pricing with Heterogeneous Agents and Long-Run Risk 07.06.2016 Philipp Illeditsch 
 Wharton14.06.2016 Milica Mormann 
 University of MiamiVisual Finance: The Role of Salience and Attention in Financial Decision Making 19.07.2016 Dirk Simons 
 Universität MannheimDo Mandatory Liquidity Disclosures Foster or Forestall Coordination Failures? Winter Term 2015/16 Date Speaker Topic 27.10.2015 Thorsten Hens 
 Universität ZürichDesigning Risk Profiler in the Laboratory 17.11.2015 Harald Scheule 
 University of Technology SydneyCredit risk in mortgage portfolios 01.12.2015 Ruediger Fahlenbrach 
 École polytechnique fédérale de LausanneHow Do Investors and Firms React to an unexpected Currency Appreciation Shock? Summer Term 2015 Date Speaker Topic 07.04.2015 Stefanie Kleimeier 
 Universität MaastrichtThe Resurgence of Cultural Borders in International Finance during the Financial Crisis: Evidence from Eurozone Cross-Border Depositing 21.04.2015 Jürgen Eichberger 
 University of HeidelbergAmbiguity and Games 05.05.2015 Martin Hibbeln 
 Technische Universität BraunschweigInformational Synergies in Consumer Credit 19.05.2015 Paul Ehling 
 BI Norwegian Business SchoolDisagreement and the Cross Section of Stock Returns 23.06.2015 Stefan Zeisberger 
 Stony Brook University, New YorkAll's Well that Ends Well? On the Importance of How Returns are Achieved 27.07.2015 Michael Weber 
 University of ChicagoThe Term Structure of Equity Returns: Risk or Mispricing? Winter Term 2014/15 Date Speaker Topic 21.10.2014 Sébastien Pouget 
 University of ToulouseTesting asset pricing theory on six hundred years of stock returns 04.11.2014 Jennifer Coats 
 Colorado State UniversityThe Effect of Ambiguity on Risk Management Choices: An Experimental Study 16.12.2014 Carsten Erner 
 UCLA Anderson School of ManagementConsumer Financial Well-Being 27.01.2015 Michael Viehs 
 University of OxfordCarbon Disclosure and Cost of Debt 03.02.2015 Jasmin Gider 
 University of BonnDeterring Illegal Insider Trading Summer Term 2014 Date Speaker Topic 08.04.2014 Erik Kole 
 Erasmus University RotterdamHow to Identify and Forecast Bull and Bear Markets? 22.04.2014 Tobias Berg 
 University of BonnPlaying the Devil’s Advocat: The Causal Effect of Risk Management on Loan Quality 06.05.2014 Andreas Richter 
 LMU MunichEndogenous Information and Adverse Selection under Loss Prevention 13.05.2014 Guillermo Baquero 
 European School of Management and Technology, BerlinThe Convexity and Concavity of the Flow-Performance Relationship for Hedge Funds 20.05.2014 Jeroen Derwall 
 Maastricht UniversityDoes Insider Trading Add Credibility to Firm Product Innovation? 27.05.2014 Tim Kroencke 
 University of MannheimAsset Pricing without Garbage 17.06.2014 Christoph Merkle 
 University of MannheimFinancial Loss Aversion Illusion 01.07.2014 Giuliano Curatola 
 Goethe University FrankfurtLoss aversion, habit formation and the term structure of equity and interest rates Winter Term 2013/14 Date Speaker Topic 22.10.2013 Kolja Loebnitz Liquidity-Adjusted Capital Requirements and Their Model-Free Properties 29.10.2013 Christian Koziol 
 University of TübingenThe Risk with Low Volatility Stocks 12.11.2013 Sarah Qian Wang 
 University of WarwickCredit Default Swaps and Corporate Cash Holdings 19.11.2013 Arvid O. I. Hoffmann 
 Maastricht UniversityTechnical Analysis and Individual Investors 26.11.2013 Hendrik Hakenes 
 University of BonnRegulatory Capture by Sophistication 03.12.2013 Stefan Ruenzi 
 University of MannheimExtreme Dependence and Asset Pricing: Returns and Liquidity 21.01.2014 Ulrich Schmidt 
 Kiel UniversitityOverconfidence and Risk Taking of Ethiopian Farmers 04.02.2014 Paulo Rodrigues 
 Maastricht UniversityValues and investments: Evidence from institutional trading responses to news components Summer Term 2013 Date Speaker Topic 27.05.2013 Alex Stomper 
 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin03.06.2013 Stefan Zeisberger 
 University of ZurichDo Investors Overreact to Small but Frequent Losses? An Experimental Analysis 17.06.2013 Norman Seeger 
 VU University Amsterdam15.07.2013 Stefan Ankirchner 
 Bonn UniversityWinter Term 2012/13 Date Speaker Topic 30.10.2012 Antje Mahayni 
 University of Duisburg-EssenOptimizing Proportional Portfolio Insurance Strategies - From Theory to Practice 13.11.2012 Thomas Post 
 Maastricht UniversityWhat Makes Investors Optimistic, What Makes Them Afraid? 27.11.2012 Rainer Haselmann 
 University of BonnCapital Regulation and Banks' Lending Behavior 03.12.2012 Ralf Meisenzahl 
 Federal Reserve BoardThe Real Effects of Credit Line Drawdowns 08.01.2013 Ralf Elsas 
 LMU MunichFrom Underleverage to Excess Debt: The Changing Environment of Corporate Debt 22.01.2013 Joachim Grammig 
 University of TübingenCreative Destruction and Asset Prices Winter Term 2011/12 Date Speaker Topic 11.10.2011 Matthias Muck 
 University of BambergOptimal Exercise Strategies for Open-End Turbo Certificates 22.11.2011 Antoon Pelsser 
 Maastricht UniversityRobustness, Model Ambiguity and Pricing 13.12.2011 André Betzer 
 University of WuppertalStrategic Trading and Trade Reporting by Corporate Insiders 17.01.2012 Maik Schmeling 
 Leibniz Universität HannoverOrder Flow, Private Information, and Currency Risk Premia 31.01.2012 Monika Trapp 
 University of CologneFund manager allocation 
 
- 
 
- 
