Finance Research Seminar

  • Current Information

    The Finance Research Seminar takes place during the lecture period on Tuesdays from 16.15 pm to 17.45 pm (im Room JUR 253) The format of each session—whether in-person, via Zoom, or hybrid—will be specified in the event invitation. The seminar is jointly organised by Nicole Branger, Nadja Guenster, Thomas Langer, Andreas Pfingsten and Christoph Schneider.

    If you have any questions about the event, please contact Mira Maslej,mira.maslej@wiwi.uni-muenster.de.

    The FR-Seminar will take place as a face-to-face event, in JUR 253. A Zoom meeting will also be offered.

    Winter Term 2025/2026

    Date

    Speaker

    Topic

    30.09.2025

    Dr. Eric Johnson

    Columbia University

    Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences with implications for research practices.

    Policymakers increasingly rely on behavioral science in response to global challenges, such as climate change or global health crises. But applications of behavioral science face an important problem: Interventions often exert substantially different effects across contexts and individuals. We examine this heterogeneity for different paradigms that underlie many behavioral interventions. We study the paradigms in a series of five pre-registered studies across one in-person and 10 online panels, with over 11,000 respond-ents in total. We find substantial heterogeneity across settings and paradigms, apply techniques for modeling the heterogeneity, and introduce a framework that measures typically omitted moderators. The framework’s factors (Fluid Intelligence, Attentiveness, Crystallized Intelligence, and Experience) affect the effectiveness of many text-based interventions, producing different observed effect sizes and explaining variations across samples. Moderators are associated with effect sizes through two paths, with the intensity of the manipulation and with the effect of the manipulation directly. Our results motivate observing these moderators and provide a theoretical and empirical framework for understanding and predicting varying effect sizes in the social sciences.   We conclude with a discussion of how to apply these results to improve research in the social sciences.

    Special Event

    Wednesday,

    01.10.2025

    Prof. Dr. Elke U. Weber

    Princeton University

    Query Theory: A Process Account of Constructed Judgments and Preferences

    Query Theory (QT) describes the process of generating and aggregating internal evidence about the merits of different judgment or choice options for the purpose of arriving at a judgment or choice.  Its assumptions about selective attention and goal-directed memory retrieval provide a unified explanation of a broad set of behavioral anomalies. QT assumes that boundedly-rational decision makers issue sequential queries to their episodic and semantic memory that request arguments in support of a specific choice option, one option at a time, but switching between options. The returned evidence is aggregated, and the option with greater support at the time of decision is selected. Critically, the request for evidence supporting the first-considered option temporarily inhibits arguments for all other options that are response competitors, making evidence supporting later-queried options harder to access when subsequent queries turn to them. Normatively irrelevant features of the way a choice is presented can be shown to influence initial attention and hence query order and choice, including incumbency or status-quo (which option is the behavioral or recommended default), surface appeal (an attractive label or image), or mechanics of the choice situation such as presentation order or reading order.  The causal role of query order is established by prompting respondents in a QT study explicitly to reverse the order of queries from their "natural" order (i.e., the order aligned with the framing condition) to the reverse or “unnatural” order, which greatly attenuated the effect of frame on judgment or choice. A meta-analysis of 27 QT studies confirms all QT assumptions and shows that an average effect size of .34 for the effect of decision frame on query order. QT processes have also been shown to mediate the influence of social norms on attitudes and behaviors, where norm information directs initial attention on norm-congruent arguments and thus influences policy support.
    07.10.2025

    Asst. Prof.
    Daniel Urban

    Erasmus University Rotterdam

    Board Gender Quotas and Female Borrowing: Evidence from Loan-Level Data

    We examine how female board representation affects banks' lending to female-led firms, using Italy's mandatory gender quota and loan-level data. As banks increase female board presence, they lend more to female-led firms on both extensive and intensive margins, including smaller firms, without increasing non-performing exposures. Female borrowers see an increase in credit availability beyond reallocation effects and show higher post-quota growth, indicating real economic effects. We also uncover organizational changes: banks promote more women among rank-and-file employees, which can explain female credit growth. Our findings highlight how board-level gender diversity can shape credit allocation and influence broader organizational outcomes.

    18.11.2025

    Dr. Christian Breitung

    Technical University of Munich and TUM School of Management, Heilbronn

    Text Is All You Need: Asset Pricing Without Returns

    How should investors value firms without return histories? When trading data are missing, investors typically rely on industry betas as coarse proxies for systematic risk, introducing valuation errors whenever firm-specific exposures differ from peer norms. Using IPOs as a natural laboratory, I show that textual risk disclosures can substitute for missing return data. I develop Aggregated Cluster Embeddings (ACE), which convert qualitative risk narratives into structured firm-level representations. Disclosure-based betas reduce market beta prediction errors by up to 27 percent relative to standard benchmarks (industry betas). However, investors underweight this information at issuance, and firms whose disclosures imply lower risk than their industry peers are initially undervalued, yielding monthly six-factor alphas of 97 basis points. These excess returns fade as return histories accumulate, consistent with markets gradually learning firm-specific covariances. The results highlight a mechanism of information substitution and investor inattention in pricing firms without trading histories.

    25.11.2025

    Jun.-Prof. Dr. Jantke de Boer

    RUB Bochum

    tbd.

     

    16.12.2025

    Prof. Dr. Lars Norden

    Brazilian School of Economics and Finance (EPGE)

    FX Dealer Constraints and External Imbalances 
    (joint with Stefan Eichler)

    We empirically test Gabaix and Maggiori (2015)'s prediction that currencies are repriced by the country's external capital dependence when financial constraints of FX intermediaries change. Using solvency indicators, we develop a novel intermediary constraints index capturing riskbearing capacity. We find that constraints are a priced risk factor in currency portfolios sorted by countries' net foreign assets. Portfolios of external debtors (creditors) have higher (lower) intermediary risk premia, but pay lower (higher) returns when constraints tighten. Tightening constraints are associated with a depreciation of countries with low net foreign assets, particularly emerging markets with high net debt and low FX reserves.
    Summer Term 2025

    Date

    Speaker

    Topic

    27.05.2025

    Craig R. Fox, Ph.D.

    University of California at Los Angeles

    Two Dimensions of Subjective Uncertainty 

    In my talk I will argue that people maintain dual intuitions about the nature of uncertainty, and these intuitions can have a critical impact on a wide range of judgments and choices. We attribute the first form of uncertainty to deficiencies in our information, expertise, and/or mental model of relevant events (knowable or “epistemic” uncertainty); we attribute the second form of uncertainty to causal systems whose behavior is inherently stochastic or unpredictable (random or “aleatory” uncertainty). In the first part of my talk I’ll show that people intuitively distinguish uncertainty along these two dimensions: it is reflected in their use of natural language and can be measured reliably using a simple rating scale that loads on two independent factors. In the second part of my talk I’ll show implications of the epistemic-aleatory distinction for understanding judgmental overconfidence, ambiguity aversion, consumer financial decision making, managerial evaluation, and other empirical phenomena.

    17.06.2025

    Prof. Dr.
    Matthias Pelster

    Universität Duisburg-Essen

    Ranking concerns or reference points: The impact of communicating expected payoffs in experimental studies

    Online platforms such as CloudResearch, Amazon MTurk, or Prolific require researchers to communicate average expected payoffs to participants prior to experiments. We show that knowledge of expected payoffs introduce confounding effects in experimental studies on risk-taking. We use the literature that shows that individuals with lower ranks take higher risks as a playground. Our experimental design disentangles this ranking effect from a reference point effect introduced by the average expected payoff. Holding the rank constant, risk-taking is 18.23% higher below the reference point on average. Holding the reference point distance constant, ranks have no significant effect on risk-taking. These results are robust to nonsocial settings and alternative risk-taking measures.
    08.07.2025

    Asst. Prof. Mete Kilic

    University of Southern California Marshall School of Business

     

     
    15.07.2025

    Ahmet Ali Taskin, Ph.D.

    FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg & Institute for Employment Research (IAB)

    Monetary policy, the bank-lending channel and labor market adjustment of firms

    This paper studies the real effects of monetary policy on firms’ labor adjustment. Using detailed bank, firm and worker data for Germany, we find that firms reduce employment in response to contractionary monetary policy. We show that this employment reduction results from a relative decline in inflows rather than outflows. Inflows fall in particular for low-wage workers, whereas firms retain high-wage workers. We interpret this as evidence for labor hoarding. Using variation in the bank exposure to monetary policy, we show that these results are driven by the exposure of the firm to the bank-lending channel.

     

     

     

     

    • Lectures from past Terms

       
      Winter term 2024/2025

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

      22.10.2024

      Prof. Dr. Steven Ongena

      University of Zurich

      Joining Forces: Why Banks Syndicate Credit

      Banks can grant loans to firms bilaterally or in syndicates. We study this choice by combining bilateral loan data with syndicated loan data. We show that loan size alone does not adequately explain syndication. Instead, banks’ ability to manage risks and firm riskiness drive the choice to syndicate. Banks are more likely to syndicate loans if their risk-bearing capacity is low and if screening and monitoring come at a high cost. Syndicated loans are more expensive and more sensitive to loan risk than bilateral loans. Our findings contradict the hypothesis that reputable borrowers graduate to the syndicated loan market.
      29.10.2024

      Prof. Dr. Neslihan Ozkan

       Bristol University

      Politics of Bank Lending: Empirical Evidence from Brown Borrowing

      This study examines the interplay between banks’ political connections and lending to brown borrowers. A bank’s political connection is captured based on whether a bank is headquartered in the state with a member from the U.S. Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee. We find that banks headquartered in states with a Banking Committee senator provide cheaper loans to brown borrowers than banks without a Banking Committee senator in their headquarter state. This finding suggests that politically connected banks can play a significant role in delaying the green transition as they extend loans to brown firms at a low rate. In addition, our results show that the effect of a bank’s political connection on the cost of lending to brown borrowers is more pronounced when the senator is senior, when borrowers, lenders, and banking committee senators are from the same state, or when the party of the Senate is Republican, or when there is a competitive re-election race. Overall, we provide novel evidence on how the politics of bank lending can have implications for green transition.
      05.11.2024

      Asst. Prof. Dr. Paulo Rodrigues

       Maastricht University

      Solving Dynamic Portfolio and Consumption Problems by Going Forward in Time

      The standard approach to solving dynamic portfolio and consumption problems numerically uses backward induction, which complicates the solution if decisions at time t depend on past decisions. In contrast, our solution algorithm goes forward in time. We use the insight that the main task in solving dynamic optimization problems consists of finding policy functions that use the current value of state variables as inputs and give the optimal decisions as outputs. Instead of assuming a functional form for these policy functions, we use a neural network for the estimation of the functions.
      12.11.2024
      im K322

      Assoc. Prof. Jörg Stahl

       Católica Lisbon School of Business & Economics

      The value of organized networking: Evidence from the World Economic Forum

      Several studies document a positive impact of social interaction on business activity and economic outcomes. While the literature identifies several ways of forming social ties, there is little evidence on the value of participating in business events that foster networking. In this paper, we analyze the value of having access to one such event - the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF). We compile a novel dataset of public firms that participate at least once in the meeting between 2013 and 2023. Participants experience positive abnormal equity returns in the days leading to the respective meeting. We identify M&A activity as a channel that can rationalize the value effects. Meeting participants have larger number of deals and higher deal values following the meeting compared to a matched control sample.
      07.01.2025

      Dr.Gerrit Liedtke

       Bremen University

      Cross-Asset Trend Spillover: A Novel Factor for Corporate Bond Returns

      We propose XTREND, a cross-asset trend factor for corporate bond returns that captures spillovers from equity market price and volume data. Using two decades of U.S. data, we apply machine learning techniques to extract information from various technical indicators, including moving averages, oscillators, and volatility measures. The resulting signal reliably predicts corporate bond returns, demonstrating robust performance across credit quality and market conditions. XTREND expands existing bond pricing models, thus, providing a more complete explanation of the cross-section of bond returns. Finally, we find that the XTREND factor is robust across 1.6 million research designs and has a probability far above 50\% to be part of the stochastic discount factor after sampling over one quadrillion models.
      14.01.2025

      Prof. Dr. Christian Fieberg

      HSB-Bremen University of Applied Sciences

      The Devil in the Details: A Multiverse View of Pockets of Predictability

      The growing complexity of forecasting models increases the number of decision nodes in the research process, raising the risk of overfitting to specific design choices. We illustrate this issue using the recent concept of “pockets of predictability,” which posits that return predictability is time-varying and that short windows of high predictability can be identified ex-ante. In this study, we reassess the robustness and practical applicability of this approach. By analyzing a multiverse of 19,440 variations of the original methodology, we find that its effectiveness depends critically on various seemingly minor methodological decisions. Furthermore, return predictability has declined significantly in recent decades, and the potential economic gains are highly sensitive to trading costs. Overall, strategies based on pockets of predictability should be approached with caution.
      28.01.2025

      Prof. Dr. Stefanie Kleimeier

       Maastricht University

      POSTPONED until further notice!

       
      Summer term 2024

      Date

      speaker

      Topic

      16.04.2024

      Prof. Dr. Matthias Efing

      HEC Paris

      Risk Managers in Banks

      Some bank regulators warn that risk managers (RMs) will collude with banks’ front offices (FOs) and rubberstamp investments if their bonuses depend on the performance of FOs. We show theoretically that positive pay correlation between FOs and RMs can instead be optimal. Based on data for German non-executive bank employees, we show empirically that performance pay is indeed positively correlated between RMs and FOs in practice. These pay correlations tend to be higher in banks with competent directors and in banks with stronger performance during the crisis of 2008, in line with our model predictions.
      07.05.2024

      Prof. Dr. Christoph Merkle

       Aarhus University

      Nudging Investors towards Sustainability - A Field Experiment with a Robo - Advisor

      In a field experiment with a German robo-advisor, we manipulate default investment settings including whether the investment follows sustainability principles or not. 1,629 new customers complete the manipulated onboarding and invest real money. 50% invest sustainably when sustainable investing is the default, but only 22% invest sustainably when the conventional investment is the default. In a survey with a subset of these investors (response rate 30%), we find that beliefs strongly depend on the selected investment. Almost all conventional investors expect higher returns and a better risk-return trade-off from the conventional investment in line with financial theory. However, a majority of sustainable investors believes that the sustainable investment will outperform. While sustainability preferences also predict investment behavior, the strong return focus contradicts the view that investors are willing to forgo substantial returns for a sustainable investment.
      14.05.2024

      Prof. Dr. Tim Adam

       Humboldt-University of Berlin

      Rating-Sensitive Bonds

      We test whether firms issue rating-sensitive bonds (RSB) as a signal of their credit quality. We find that upon announcement the issuer’s stock and bond prices increase significantly, while the issuer’s CDS spread declines. Firms subject to higher information asymmetries and firms just above the non-investment grade threshold are more likely to issue RSB, especially during periods of market distress. RSB issuers are ex-post more likely to experience a credit rating improvement relative to regular bond issuers. These results are consistent with RSBs being a credible signaling device.
      28.05.2024

      Prof. Dr. Steffen Hitzemann

       Houston University

      Does Sustainable Investing Make Stocks Less Sensitive to Information about Cash Flows?

      Traditional finance theory asserts that stock prices depend on expected future cash flows. We explore how the growing prominence of non-pecuniary preferences in the form of sustainable investing alters this core financial relationship. Using the setting of earnings announcements, we find that sustainable investing diminishes stock price sensitivity to earnings news by 45%-58%. This decline in announcement-day returns is mirrored by a comparable drop in trading volume. This effect persists beyond the immediate announcement period, implying a lasting alteration in price formation rather than a short-lived mispricing. Our findings suggest that sustainable investing reduces the significance of cash flows in shaping stock prices.
      04.06.2024

      Prof. Dr. Mete Kilic

       USC Marshall-University

      Risk and Risk-Free Rates

      Risk-free interest rates and the VIX index comove negatively on average, as predicted by precautionary savings. But this comovement turns positive on FOMC days. This pattern is consistently observed across a diverse array of risk-free interest rates, including nominal, real, swap, short-term, and long-term rates. Our high-frequency analysis reveals that the positive impact of monetary policy shocks on financial market risk drives this result. We provide an explanation for these findings in a model where levered investors akin to financial intermediaries hold and price a risky asset, such as equity. Upon an unexpected positive monetary policy shock, equilibrium interest rates and levered investors' borrowing costs increase persistently. This raises investors' leverage and the volatility of stochastic discount factor, leading to lower risk appetite and amplified financial market risks.
      09.07.2024

      Dr. William Quinn

      Queen's University Belfast

      Who Wins and Loses in a Bubble? Evidence from the British Bicycle Mania

      How do different types of investors perform during financial bubbles? Using a rich archival source, we explore investor performance during the British bicycle mania of the 1890s. We find that directors and employees of cycle companies reduced their holdings substantially during the crash. Those holding shares after the crash were generally not from groups stereotypically thought of as naïve, but gentlemen living near a stock exchange, who had sufficient time, money, and opportunity to engage in speculation. Our findings suggest that the investors most at risk of losing during a bubble are those prone to familiarity and overconfidence biases.
      Summer Term 2023

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

      09.05.2023

      Prof. Dr. Heiko Jacobs

       University Duisburg-Essen

      News, noise, hype? Media sentiment and price run-ups​

       We empirically test competing hypotheses about the role of financial media sentiment in price run-ups. Our global analysis of unusual price increases in long-only as well as long/short stock market segments provides no evidence of media slant. This assessment is further supported, among others, by the analysis of thematically focused articles, by the study of price discovery during media strikes as well as by the analysis of media sentiment in the context of twin stocks. Overall, our findings are consistent with the informative nature of the financial media.

       

      tba

      Dr. Sabine Bernard

       Goethe University Frankfurt

      tba

       

      Winter Term 2022/23

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

      08.11.2022

      Dr. Doron Reichmann

       Ruhr-University Bochum

      Listen Closely: Using Vocal Clues to Predict Future Earnings​

        In this study, we aim to advance the prediction of firm earnings – an important task for many business applications. While existing earnings prediction models only rely on numerical financial data, we hypothesize and find that vocal cues from manager speech yield substantial predictive power. Our vocal cue models significantly outperform models based on detailed financial data and textual inputs. We further analyze the models' economic value to investment practitioners. We find that investors can use the models' earnings forecasts to implement trading strategies that beat the market by 8.8% on average per year. Moreover, financial analysts can use vocal cues to improve their earnings forecast accuracy by more than 40%. Collectively, our results imply that managers' vocal cues are important information signals for future earnings that investment practitioners currently overhear.

       

      15.11.2022

      Prof. Klaus Schaeck

      University of Bristol

      The Lending Channel of Bank Climate Stress Tests

        We ask how bank climate stress test affects firm outcomes. Using the French Bank Climate Risk Stress Test in 2020 as a natural experiment, we find initial results that stress tested banks reduce credit supply and charge higher interest rates for high emitters in the syndicated loan markets. We propose to examine how high emitters that linked to stress tested banks change their investment. Our results shed light on the debate about the role of banks in promoting a carbon-neutral economy.

       

      29.11.2022

      Prof. Dr. Oliver Spalt

      Universität Mannheim

      The Impact of Institutional Investors on Equity Prices: Evidence From A Reform of U.S. Trust Law

        We study the equity market implications of a reform in the laws that govern trust investments, implemented in a staggered fashion across U.S. states from 1986 to 2007. The introduction of the prudent investor rule systematically alters the relative attractiveness of stocks within the cross-section of U.S. equities for trust funds. As trust funds account for a substantial fraction of institutional equity holdings in our sample period, our empirical setting provides a rare opportunity to study the impact of a regulatory change on institutional investor holdings and relative prices in the U.S. equity market. We show that in response to the law change, trusts rebalance their portfolios away from “prudent” stocks, which were implicitly advantaged under the old regulatory regime. Stocks bought by trusts after the law change substantially outperform stocks sold by those funds. The return effects are long-lasting and do not revert over the next 12 months. The results in our paper suggest that shocks to institutional investor demand can have a profound and sustained influence on stock prices and that regulatory changes can have large indirect, and potentially unintended, consequences for market prices.

       

      06.12.2022

      Assistant Prof. Roberto Steri

      University of Luxembourg

      Credit Market Equivalents and the Valuation of Private Firms​

       

      We propose to value leveraged buyout investments by credit market equivalents (CME). Our method relies on the observation that portfolio companies held by private equity funds have loans traded in secondary markets. We exploit their market valuations by constructing a stochastic discount factor that prices loan returns of private equity portfolios from deal-level data. We identify a credit factor model to price buyout cash flows to derive their CME valuation. We find no evidence for buyout outperformance after controlling for credit market factors. Our method works whenever credit and private equity markets are sufficiently integrated, for which we provide evidence. 

      17.01.2023

      Associate Prof. Andras Danis

      Central European University CEU Wien

      Shadow Inflation​

       

      We use cell phone tracking data to document an increase in wait times at U.S.establishments in 2021. The results are consistent with a sudden increase in demand, coupled with severe labor constraints. The results are particularly pronounced in the restaurant industry, and the increase is particularly large at restaurants in non-white neighborhoods. We estimate that the increase in wait time creates an aggregate opportunity cost of up to $5 billion per month for American consumers. If wait time were added as an expense in the CPI consumption basket, inflation would have been up to 2 percentage points higher in the food away from home category. Finally, we show that an increase in wait time can predict future inflation. Our results suggest that wait times in the U.S. have started to increase already in 2020 in some industries,well before the supply chain disruptions of 2021. 

      24.01.2023

      Assistant Prof.Ole Wilms

      Universität Hamburg

      Asset Pricing with Disagreement about Climate Risks​

       

      This paper presents an asset-pricing model with heterogeneous beliefs regarding the impacts of climate change. Investors disagree on the likelihood of climate-induced disaster risks that could destroy a large fraction of consumption. The model jointly explains several findings that have been established in the empirical literature on climate finance. That is, (i) news about climate change can be hedged in financial markets, (ii) the share of green investors has significantly increased over the past decade, (iii) investors require a positive, although small, climate-risk premium for holding “brown" assets, and (iv) “green" stocks have outperformed brown stocks during the past decade. Furthermore, the model may explain why investments to mitigate climate change have been small in the past. Finally, the model predicts that the marginal gain from carbon reducing investments as well as the carbon premium should increase significantly if the rise in global temperature continues.  

      31.01.2023

      Assistant Prof. Ruediger Weber

      WU Wien

      Is there an Equity Duration Premium?​​

      Equity duration is a measure of discount-rate sensitivity that is driven by both, stock-specific cash-flow timing and stock-specific discount-rate levels. Established measures of equity duration using market-price information derive their predictive power for returns from using market-implied discount rates. We introduce new measures of pure cash-flow timing which disentangle discount-rate level from cash-flow timing information. Our results indicate an unconditionally flat relationship between timing and average returns. However, it turns out that in recessions (expansion episodes), there is a negative (positive) relation between cash-flow timing and average stock returns. 

      07.02.2023

      Prof. Dr. Merih Sevilir

      ESMT Berlin

      Postpone to autumn 2023!

       

       

      Summer Term 2022

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

      03.05.2022

      Prof. Dr. Stefanie Kleimeier

       Open University & Maastricht University

      Contracts, Collateral and Culture: Gender Effects in Retail Loans​

       

      We analyze gender differences in interest rates using unusually rich data on retail loans from a bank in Vietnam—a country where women traditionally make financial decisions. After ruling out gender differences in information, credit risk, and default rates, women pay marginally lower interest rates. The gender gaps differ between loans with and without an exogenous collateralization requirement suggesting that the micro context of loan negotiations matters. In support of the pivotal role of the contracting environment, we exploit historical differences between South and North Vietnam and show that women pay comparably lower rates in the more matriarchal cultural context.

      WINTERTERM 2020/21

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

      10 November 2020

      Dr. Bjoen Imbierowicz

      Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt

      How Are Banks Special? – Let Me Count the Ways

      The event will be organized as a digital Zoom-Meeting.

       

      22 December 2020

      David Schreindorfer

      Arizona State University, Tempe, USA

      Persistent Crises and Levered Asset Prices

      The event will be organized as a digital Zoom-Meeting.

       

      Summerterm 2020

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

      28 April 2020

      Dr. Thomas Post

      Associate Professor of Finance, Open University & Maastricht University

      Household Finance 0.5 or 2.0? Eliciting Individuals’ Financial Decision-Making Approaches

      25 May 2020

      André Uhde

      Paderborn Univeristy

      Tax avoidance through securitization

       

       

           

      Winterterm 2019/20

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

           

      Summerterm 2019

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

      02.07.2019

      Sebastian Gehricke

      University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

      Modeling VXX under jump diffusion with stochastic long-term mean

      Attention Please!

      Starting time 12:15 in J 253.

      09.07.2019

      Toni Ahnert

      Bank of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

      Bank Competition, Bank Runs and Opacity

      Winterterm 2018/19

      Date

      Speaker

      Topic

      18.12.2018

      Oliver Entrop

      University of Passau

      Optimal Early Exercise Strategies under Transaction and Decision Costs
      15.01.2019

      Sven Klingler

      BI Oslo, Department of Finance

       

      How Safe are Safe Haven?
      • Lectures from Previous Semesters

        Summer Term 2018

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        29.05.2018

        Theresa Spickers

        Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
        Fakultät für Betriebswirtschaft
        Institut für Kapitalmärkte und Finanzwirtschaft

        Firms’ self-assessed climate risk and asset pricing

        Winter Term 2017/18

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        19.12.2017

        Lars Norden
        Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration (EBAPE),
        Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV) Rio de Janeiro

        Does Uniqueness in Banking Matter?

        30.01.2018

        Olav Korn
        Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

        Stock Illiquidity and Option Returns

        Summer Term 2017

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        23.05.2017

        Florian S. Peters
        University of Amsterdam (UvA)

        Optimism Propagation

        13.06.2017

        Bryan Foltice
        Butler University

        Exponential Growth Bias Matters: Evidence and Implications for Financial Decision Making of College Students in the U.S.A.

        20.06.2017

        Valeri Sokolovski
        Stockholm School of Economics 
        from June 2017
        HEC Montreal

        Crowds, Crashes, and the Carry Trade

        04.07.2017

        Christian Leuz 
        University of Chicago 
        Booth School of Business

        Who Falls Prey to the Wolf of Wall Street? Investor Participation in Market Manipulation

        11.07.2017

        Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt 
        University of Cologne

        Concentration Bias in Intertemporal Choice

        18.07.2017

        Elisabeth Kempf 
        University of Chicago 
        Booth School of Business

        Canary in a Coalmine: Securities Lending Predicting the Performance of Securitized Bonds

        Winter Term 2016/17

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        18.10.2016

        Christine Laudenbach 
        Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main

        Personal reminders and commitment: debt management as a natural experiment

        15.11.2016

        Tobin Hanspal 
        Copenhagen Business School

        Once Bitten, Twice Shy: The Role of Inertia and Personal Experiences in Risk Taking

        13.12.2016

        Gesa-Kristina Petersen 
        LMU München

        What we say is who we are - How fund manager profiles and their strategies predict fund investment and performance

        24.01.2017

        Valeriya Dinger 
        University of Osnabrück

        Systemic Effects of Bank Equity Issues: Competition, Stabilization and Contagion

        31.01.2017

        Olesya V. Grishchenko 
        Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C.

        The term structure of interest rates with short-term and long-term risks

        07.02.2017

        Philipp Krueger 
        University of Geneva

        The Sustainability Footprint of Institutional Investors

        Summer Term 2016

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        03.05.2016

        Matthias Sutter 
        Universität zu Köln

        Where to look for the morals in markets?

        24.05.2016

        Karl Schmedders 
        Universität Zürich

        Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Agents and Long-Run Risk

        07.06.2016

        Philipp Illeditsch 
        Wharton

        Disagreement about Inflation and the Yield Curve

        14.06.2016

        Milica Mormann 
        University of Miami

        Visual Finance: The Role of Salience and Attention in Financial Decision Making

        19.07.2016

        Dirk Simons 
        Universität Mannheim

        Do Mandatory Liquidity Disclosures Foster or Forestall Coordination Failures?

        Winter Term 2015/16

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        27.10.2015

        Thorsten Hens 
        Universität Zürich

        Designing Risk Profiler in the Laboratory

        17.11.2015

        Harald Scheule 
        University of Technology Sydney

        Credit risk in mortgage portfolios

        01.12.2015

        Ruediger Fahlenbrach 
        École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

        How Do Investors and Firms React to an unexpected Currency Appreciation Shock?

        Summer Term 2015

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        07.04.2015

        Stefanie Kleimeier 
        Universität Maastricht

        The Resurgence of Cultural Borders in International Finance during the Financial Crisis: Evidence from Eurozone Cross-Border Depositing

        21.04.2015

        Jürgen Eichberger 
        University of Heidelberg

        Ambiguity and Games

        05.05.2015

        Martin Hibbeln 
        Technische Universität Braunschweig

        Informational Synergies in Consumer Credit

        19.05.2015

        Paul Ehling 
        BI Norwegian Business School

        Disagreement and the Cross Section of Stock Returns

        23.06.2015 

        Stefan Zeisberger 
        Stony Brook University, New York

        All's Well that Ends Well? On the Importance of How Returns are Achieved

        27.07.2015 

        Michael Weber 
        University of Chicago

        The Term Structure of Equity Returns: Risk or Mispricing?

        Winter Term 2014/15

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        21.10.2014

        Sébastien Pouget 
        University of Toulouse

        Testing asset pricing theory on six hundred years of stock returns

        04.11.2014

        Jennifer Coats 
        Colorado State University

        The Effect of Ambiguity on Risk Management Choices: An Experimental Study

        16.12.2014

        Carsten Erner 
        UCLA Anderson School of Management

        Consumer Financial Well-Being

        27.01.2015

        Michael Viehs 
        University of Oxford

        Carbon Disclosure and Cost of Debt

        03.02.2015

        Jasmin Gider 
        University of Bonn

        Deterring Illegal Insider Trading

        Summer Term 2014

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        08.04.2014

        Erik Kole 
        Erasmus University Rotterdam

        How to Identify and Forecast Bull and Bear Markets?

        22.04.2014

        Tobias Berg 
        University of Bonn

        Playing the Devil’s Advocat: The Causal Effect of Risk Management on Loan Quality

        06.05.2014

        Andreas Richter 
        LMU Munich

        Endogenous Information and Adverse Selection under Loss Prevention

        13.05.2014

        Guillermo Baquero 
        European School of Management and Technology, Berlin

        The Convexity and Concavity of the Flow-Performance Relationship for Hedge Funds

        20.05.2014

        Jeroen Derwall 
        Maastricht University

        Does Insider Trading Add Credibility to Firm Product Innovation?

        27.05.2014

        Tim Kroencke 
        University of Mannheim

        Asset Pricing without Garbage

        17.06.2014

        Christoph Merkle 
        University of Mannheim

        Financial Loss Aversion Illusion

        01.07.2014

        Giuliano Curatola 
        Goethe University Frankfurt

        Loss aversion, habit formation and the term structure of equity and interest rates

        Winter Term 2013/14

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        22.10.2013

        Kolja Loebnitz

        Liquidity-Adjusted Capital Requirements and Their Model-Free Properties

        29.10.2013 

        Christian Koziol 
        University of Tübingen

        The Risk with Low Volatility Stocks

        12.11.2013

        Sarah Qian Wang 
        University of Warwick

        Credit Default Swaps and Corporate Cash Holdings

        19.11.2013

        Arvid O. I. Hoffmann 
        Maastricht University

        Technical Analysis and Individual Investors

        26.11.2013

        Hendrik Hakenes 
        University of Bonn

        Regulatory Capture by Sophistication

        03.12.2013

        Stefan Ruenzi 
        University of Mannheim

        Extreme Dependence and Asset Pricing: Returns and Liquidity

        21.01.2014

        Ulrich Schmidt 
        Kiel Universitity

        Overconfidence and Risk Taking of Ethiopian Farmers

        04.02.2014

        Paulo Rodrigues 
        Maastricht University

        Values and investments: Evidence from institutional trading responses to news components

        Summer Term 2013

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        27.05.2013

        Alex Stomper 
        Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

        The Politics of Related Lending

        03.06.2013

        Stefan Zeisberger 
        University of Zurich

        Do Investors Overreact to Small but Frequent Losses? An Experimental Analysis

        17.06.2013

        Norman Seeger 
        VU University Amsterdam

        Out-of-Sample Performance of Jump-Diffusion Models for Equity Indices: What the Financial Crisis was Good for

        15.07.2013

        Stefan Ankirchner 
        Bonn University

        Hedging Forward Positions: Basis Risk vs. Liquidity Costs

        Winter Term 2012/13

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        30.10.2012

        Antje Mahayni 
        University of Duisburg-Essen

        Optimizing Proportional Portfolio Insurance Strategies - From Theory to Practice

        13.11.2012

        Thomas Post 
        Maastricht University

        What Makes Investors Optimistic, What Makes Them Afraid?

        27.11.2012

        Rainer Haselmann 
        University of Bonn

        Capital Regulation and Banks' Lending Behavior

        03.12.2012

        Ralf Meisenzahl 
        Federal Reserve Board

        The Real Effects of Credit Line Drawdowns

        08.01.2013

        Ralf Elsas 
        LMU Munich

        From Underleverage to Excess Debt: The Changing Environment of Corporate Debt

        22.01.2013

        Joachim Grammig 
        University of Tübingen

        Creative Destruction and Asset Prices

        Winter Term 2011/12

        Date

        Speaker

        Topic

        11.10.2011

        Matthias Muck 
        University of Bamberg

        Optimal Exercise Strategies for Open-End Turbo Certificates

        22.11.2011

        Antoon Pelsser 
        Maastricht University

        Robustness, Model Ambiguity and Pricing

        13.12.2011

        André Betzer 
        University of Wuppertal

        Strategic Trading and Trade Reporting by Corporate Insiders

        17.01.2012

        Maik Schmeling 
        Leibniz Universität Hannover

        Order Flow, Private Information, and Currency Risk Premia

        31.01.2012

        Monika Trapp 
        University of Cologne

        Fund manager allocation